Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05556
Original file (BC 2012 05556.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05556
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Date of Birth (DOB) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of 
Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from 29 May 
50 to 29 May 48.

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The year of his birth is incorrect on his DD Form 214.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
original birth certificate and DD Form 214.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s DD Form 214 lists his DOB as 29 May 50.

On 7 Jan 13, a letter was sent to the applicant requesting the 
original or a certified/notarized copy of his birth certificate. 

________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial.  DPSIRP states that the applicant 
failed to provide the legal document that is required to change 
his DOB.  The birth certificate the applicant provided is not an 
original or certified copy; therefore, it does not meet the 
legal requirements to be used as a source document.

AFI 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, Table A7, allows 
the Air Force to make changes on prior service personnel if the 
data in question was recorded in error.  

The applicant has failed to provide supporting documentation and 
absent such documentation there is no proof his DOB was recorded 
in error.

The complete DPSIRP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 22 Mar 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit 
D).  As of this date, this office has received no response.

________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  We note the 
applicant was asked to provide an original or a 
certified/notarized copy of his birth certificate as required by 
the Air Force Instruction to make the change.  However, the 
applicant has failed to do so.  Should the applicant provide the 
documentation noted above we would be willing to reconsider his 
request.  In the absence of such evidence, we find no basis to 
recommend the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________


The following members of the Board considered Docket Number    
BC-2012-05556 in Executive Session on 5 Sep 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number 
BC-2012-05556 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 Nov 12, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIRP, dated 5 Mar 13.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Mar 13.




								
					Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00372

    Original file (BC-2012-00372.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIRP states that Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Table A7, requires the source document for the requested change to be either the original or, a certified or notarized copy of the original. On 5 April 2012, their office notified the applicant of the documentation requirement; however, to date the applicant has not furnished the original or notarized copy of his birth certificate. We note the applicant was notified by letter from AFPC/DPSIRP that in order to verify his true DOB, they...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00721

    Original file (BC-2012-00721.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 Sep 12, AFPC/DPSOR notified the applicant that IAW AFI 36- 3202, Separation Documents they cannot add the statement “Vietnam Era Veteran” to his DD Form 214; however, his Kuwait Liberation Medal has been amended to read Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-K) and will be administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his name in his military personnel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01970

    Original file (BC-2010-01970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 4, Enlistment Record, dated 28 February 1956 and his DD Form 214, dated 27 February 1960 lists his DOB as “10 February 1939.” The DD Form 4, dated 28 February 1960 and his DD Form 214, dated 5 September 1963 list his DOB as “10 December 1939.” ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial, stating, in part, AFI 36-2609, Military Personnel Records System, permits changes to be made for former...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00945

    Original file (BC 2013 00945.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his birth certificate, WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge; WD-AGO Form 100, Army of the United States Separation Qualification Record, a witness statement from a lieutenant stating that he was stationed in Tinian, Island, Japan with the applicant and various other documents associated with his request. A review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03603

    Original file (BC-2011-03603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03603 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended with a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, to reflect her name as Vanessa J. Peay. As the applicant has not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01022

    Original file (BC 2014 01022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The absence of any original or a certified copy of the legal supporting documentation is not sufficient to evaluate whether the date was recorded in error. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIRP,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02427

    Original file (BC 2014 02427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02427 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His name be changed on his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05184

    Original file (BC-2012-05184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 does not reflect the name stated in his request. However, we advise the applicant submit to the VA a certified copy of the legal document that identifies his name change for their review and consideration. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIRP, dated 5 Mar 13.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00875

    Original file (BC 2014 00875.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While we note the comments of the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicating that there was no evidence presented that the applicant’s date of birth was erroneously recorded, based...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01357

    Original file (BC 2014 01357.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, Table A7.5, Correction of Date of Birth, Note 3 states, "Do not correct records of former members unless evidence proves the date of birth used while serving with the Air Force was erroneously recorded". Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, Table A7.1, Note 1 states, "Do not correct records of former members unless evidence proves the SSN used while serving with the Air Force was erroneously...